Skip to content

refactor: Use a Rust-based filesystem storage implementation#1833

Draft
janbuchar wants to merge 6 commits intomasterfrom
rust-filesystem-storage
Draft

refactor: Use a Rust-based filesystem storage implementation#1833
janbuchar wants to merge 6 commits intomasterfrom
rust-filesystem-storage

Conversation

@janbuchar
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

  • Go to https://github.com/apify/crawlee-storage to see the implementation
  • The motivation is to avoid duplication of the local storage implementation - there are subtle performance optimizations in Crawlee for JS v3 and it'd be difficult to maintain parity

@janbuchar janbuchar added t-tooling Issues with this label are in the ownership of the tooling team. adhoc Ad-hoc unplanned task added during the sprint. labels Apr 3, 2026
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 137th sprint - Tooling team milestone Apr 3, 2026
@github-actions github-actions bot added the tested Temporary label used only programatically for some analytics. label Apr 3, 2026
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Apr 9, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 94.62366% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 92.66%. Comparing base (88bd05a) to head (462f747).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...rage_clients/_file_system/_request_queue_client.py 92.98% 4 Missing ⚠️
...ge_clients/_file_system/_key_value_store_client.py 95.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1833      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.28%   92.66%   +0.37%     
==========================================
  Files         157      157              
  Lines       10919    10277     -642     
==========================================
- Hits        10077     9523     -554     
+ Misses        842      754      -88     
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 92.66% <94.62%> (+0.37%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@janbuchar janbuchar force-pushed the rust-filesystem-storage branch from 0c637bb to d64db9b Compare April 9, 2026 17:38
@janbuchar janbuchar force-pushed the rust-filesystem-storage branch from d64db9b to 462f747 Compare April 9, 2026 17:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

adhoc Ad-hoc unplanned task added during the sprint. t-tooling Issues with this label are in the ownership of the tooling team. tested Temporary label used only programatically for some analytics.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants