Skip to content

Password Secure: Release 26.4.10#827

Open
florian-berger-netwrix wants to merge 3 commits intodevfrom
passwordsecure-release-26_4_10
Open

Password Secure: Release 26.4.10#827
florian-berger-netwrix wants to merge 3 commits intodevfrom
passwordsecure-release-26_4_10

Conversation

@florian-berger-netwrix
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Adds the changeset of the new Password Secure version (26.4.10)

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Documentation PR Review

Editorial Review

docs/passwordsecure/current/introduction/versionhistory/version_26.4.10.34111.md

  • Clarity — Line 14: "by separating search values by space" uses "by" twice in a row, creating awkward grammar. Suggested fix: "by separating search values with a space."

  • Clarity — Line 30: Uses second person ("When you use...") while the rest of the changelog uses third person ("When filtering...", "the application now transmits..."). This creates a POV inconsistency within the same section. Suggested fix: "When the 'Exchange form' is used in the Windows application with 'Create as new' selected as the action for the field, the application now transmits the password value correctly."

  • Clarity — Line 36: The sentence "Following the suggested Content-Security-Policy header for the web server, it wasn't possible to cause any damage." is difficult to parse. The participial phrase "Following the suggested..." has no clear subject, and "cause any damage" is vague for a security disclosure. Suggested fix: "With the recommended Content-Security-Policy header configured on the web server, this issue did not allow execution of arbitrary scripts."

  • Clarity — Line 50: "It is possible now to permanently delete users that created an API key." has two issues: (1) the word order "possible now" is inverted — standard English puts the adverb before "possible"; (2) "users that" should be "users who" when referring to people. Suggested fix: "It is now possible to permanently delete users who created an API key."

Summary

4 editorial suggestions across 1 file. Vale and Dale issues are auto-fixed separately.


What to do next:

Comment @claude on this PR followed by your instructions to get help:

  • @claude fix all issues — fix all editorial issues
  • @claude help improve the flow of this document — get writing assistance
  • @claude explain the voice issues — understand why something was flagged

You can ask Claude anything about the review or about Netwrix writing standards.

Automated fixes are only available for branches in this repository, not forks.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Auto-Fix Summary

13 issues fixed, 0 skipped across 1 files

Category Fixes
Dale: misplaced-modifiers 1
Dale: passive-voice 4
Dale: wordiness 8

Ask @claude on this PR if you'd like an explanation of any fix.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants