Draft
Conversation
c4255a7 to
3f87852
Compare
3f87852 to
295e3bf
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The content of
AIMessagecould differ between different providers.For example:
content-blocks. Those are dictionaries that include additional information.An example of Gemini's content-block could look like this:
This content-block contains additional information such as the thought signatures that the Gemini models use.
Additionaly, the Gemini models include the thought signatures in langchain's
AIMessage.additional_kwargswhen issuing a tool call - this is also addressed here by adding anextrasfield to the SDKAIMessage.All those changes should accomodate to the model providers sending additional information along their responses.
Currently, only the
TextBlockis supported, since I didn't see any other one returned from the LLMs I had access to. Other "unsupported" content blocks are stored inOpaqueBlocks which are created to persist blocks that are returned by LLM, but not useful for the SDKs. Those would be returned back to the LLM so that the context is preserved. We can add support to other blocks if needed.The developers should handle possible formats of responses by checking the type or use structured outputs to make sure every model responds with the same format.